A potential setback in personalized cancer medicine
A potential setback in personalized cancer medicine. Credit: © lightsource - Depositphotos
One of the most constant and exhaustive searches in cancer research is for a treatment aimed specifically at the Ras family of genes, the most common oncogenes and those that initiate many of the most lethal tumours. However, the results of this hypothetical treatment may be far less positive than speculated due to a manuscript published in the Genes & Development journal by the Genomic Instability Group at the Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO). The study shows how cells are capable of surviving even in the total absence of Ras genes if another gene, Erf, is also lost.
Discovered in 1982 – by Mariano Barbacid’s group, among others (who is also participating in this study) -, alterations in Ras genes were the first mutation described in cancer. This was a paradigm-shifting discovery, since for the first time revealed that tumours are initiated by mutations in our own genes, thereby raising hope that if inhibitors for these mutated genes were created, cancer could be cured. “It is the base of personalised medicine”, explains Óscar Fernández-Capetillo, leader of this work.
Ras, the Holy Grail of targets to fight cancer
In addition to being the first oncogene ever described, mutations in Ras genes are the most common and those that initiate the most lethal tumours: e.g. lung, pancreas or colon. Therefore, developing a RAS pharmacological inhibitor has frequently been described as the search for the “Holy Grail” in the battle against cancer, in which billions have been invested and its highest exponent lies in ‘The Ras Initiative’, launched in 2013 by the US National Institutes for Health (NIH).
However, achieving an inhibitor for RAS proteins is complicated due mainly to their three-dimensional structure, similar to a sphere, which makes it difficult to generate pharmaceuticals that inhibit their activity. As an alternative to treating these tumours, pharmaceuticals have been developed that attack the other members of the Ras route, such as inhibitors of MEK, RAF, EGFR…
“Personalised medicine, in spite of being a good idea and having success stories, has its Achilles heel in the fact that tumours do not only have one mutation, but dozens or even hundreds of them, so while treatments generally work for a limited time, tumours invariably end up developing resistance due to another mutation”, highlights Fernández-Capetillo.
Although therapies against the RAS route constitute an important part of current antitumoral strategies, the search for RAS inhibitors continues “despite the fact that it is not clear if tumours are not going to be capable of developing resistance to these treatments”, highlights Sergio Ruiz, co-leader of the study. “In our work, we show that it is even possible to develop teratomas (a type of germinal tumour) lacking all RAS genes, if the tumour also lacks ERF expression”, he adds.
ERF loss rescues the effects of RAS deficiency
The main role of RAS proteins consists of translating external growth signals (nutrients, growth factors, etc.) into proliferating responses within the cell. When RAS proteins are eliminated in mouse stem cells, these remain in a sort-of suspended state: they do not grow, they do not differentiate into other cell types and are not capable of forming tumours.
Cristina Mayor-Ruiz, first author of the study, initially observed that certain tumour cells the authors were working with were capable of growing even in the absence of serum, if the gene Erf was also eliminated.
Fernández-Capetillo explains “For me, this discovery was the origin of the project as it made us speculate that if cells can grow with hardly any nutrients upon eliminating ERF, this could even allow the growth of RAS-free cells”. This hypothesis turned out to be true: eliminating ERF allows mouse embryonic stem cells to grow, differentiate and even generate tumours in total absence of RAS genes.
The study also explains the mechanism by which ERF restricts the action of RAS proteins. In the absence of RAS, ERF is recruited to the regulating areas (“enhancers”) of multiple genes, modulating their function, which ultimately limits cell growth. “ERF is a kind of brake that limits the consequences of RAS activation”, indicates Cristina Mayor-Ruiz.
“The message is not good, but its knowledge is important for cancer research and the so frequently mentioned personalised medicine”, sums up Fernández-Capetillo. “Although a perfect inhibitor of RAS is finally achieved, tumours may be capable of becoming resistant to the treatment accumulating mutations in genes like ERF”. In fact, recent studies have found ERF mutations in cancer patients, indicating that such situation may indeed exist in the clinic. Therefore, Fernández-Capetillo’s group is now exploring whether mutations in ERF can account for the resistance to personalised therapies against inhibitors of the RAS route.
Materials provided by the Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncologicas (CNIO). Content may be edited for clarity, style, and length.